Search this site

powered by Google

HEC Home

Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act (DFSCA), and Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations

Introduction
Part 86, the Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations (Education Department General Administrative Regulations [EDGAR]), requires that, as a condition of receiving funds or any other form of financial assistance under any federal program, an institution of higher education (IHE)1 must certify that it has adopted and implemented a program to prevent the unlawful possession, use, or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol by students and employees. If audited, failure to comply with the Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations may cause an institution to forfeit eligibility for federal funding.2

DFSCA Biennial Review Information

Minimum Requirements

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Compliance Checklist (PDF)

Supplemental Checklist (PDF)

Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations

Additional Perspectives (PDF)

Complying With the Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations publication

Prevention Update: The Higher Education Amendments

For More Information

In order to be able to certify its compliance with the regulations, an IHE must adopt and implement a drug prevention program to prevent the unlawful possession, use, or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol by all students and employees both on school premises and as part of any of its activities. Creating a program that complies with the regulations requires an IHE to do the following:

  1. Annually notify each employee and student, in writing, of standards of conduct; a description of appropriate sanctions for violation of federal, state, and local law and campus policy; a description of health risks associated with AOD use; and a description of available treatment programs.
  2. Develop a sound method for distributing annual notification information to every student and staff member each year.
  3. Prepare a biennial report on the effectiveness of its AOD programs and the consistency of sanction enforcement.
  4. Maintain its biennial review report on file, so that, if requested to do so by the U.S. Department of Education, the campus can submit it.3

DFSCA Biennial Review Information
The regulations do not specify a date by which the biennial review must be completed and on file—they simply require that a campus complete a review every two years. Since the regulations went into effect in an even-numbered year (1990), long practice has held that campuses conduct a biennial review by the end of each even-numbered calendar year.

Periodically, the U.S. Department of Education may direct its Higher Education Center to analyze a random sample of biennial reviews from colleges and universities nationwide. The Center will contact campuses included in the sample directly when an analysis is to be conducted.


Minimum Requirements
The Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations4 require at a minimum that each institution distribute the following in writing to all students and employees annually:

The law further requires an institution of higher education to conduct a biennial review of its program:

In addition to the aforementioned minimum set of requirements, campuses may have additional obligations under state law. Equally important may be recent court decisions in lawsuits brought against IHEs by college and university students and employees.6 Consultation with an attorney knowledgeable in this area is highly recommended.


For More Information

Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations
"Part 86 Compliance Checklist" (PDF) : This checklist, developed by the Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse and Violence Prevention, helps campus officials determine whether their actions satisfy the minimum legal requirements of the DFSCA regulations.

"Supplemental Checklist: Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations (EDGAR Part 86)" (PDF) This expanded checklist, developed by the Higher Education Center, goes beyond the letter of the law to assist campuses in thoroughly reviewing their alcohol and other drug (AOD) prevention programs. Although campuses are not required to use this document as an outline for their biennial review, doing so will help fulfill the DFSCA requirements. The "Supplemental Checklist" embodies the goals and spirit of the regulations, helping campuses create effective and all-encompassing AOD prevention programs. Additionally, the "Supplemental Checklist" may guide efforts for those wishing to infuse environmental management methods into their existing prevention program. The "Supplemental Checklist" give examples of What Campuses Are Doing.

To read the text of EDGAR Part 86, visit Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations.

For questions regarding the DFSCA, please visit the Center’s DFSCA FAQ page.

Related Publications
Setting and Improving Policies for Reducing Alcohol and Other Drug Problems on Campus: A Guide for School Administrators

Complying With the Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations [EDGAR Part 86]: A Guide for University and College Administrators (PDF)

Related Services
To receive assistance with AOD prevention on your campus or for general inquiries, visit our Information & Assistance page.

To learn more about AOD programs in your region, visit the Web site of The Network Addressing Collegiate Alcohol and Other Drug Issues.

To learn more about the Higher Education Center’s Team Training, visit our Training page.


Notes

1 EDGAR Part 86.1, titled "What Is the Purpose of the Drug-Free Schools and Campuses Regulations?" and 20. U.S.C. 1145g.

2 EDGAR Part 86.301.

3 EDGAR Part 86.103 (a).

4 Also known as Part 86 of the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), 34 CFR Parts 74, 75, 76, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99.

5 See 20 U.S.C. 1145g and EDGAR Part 86.100 (a) (2), (3), (4), (5). A disciplinary sanction may include the completion of an appropriate rehabilitation program.

6 For a discussion of some of the leading cases is this area, see Robert D. Bickel and Peter F. Lake, "Reconceptualizing the University's Duty to Provide a Safe Learning Environment: A Criticism of the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis and the Restatement (Second) of Torts," 20 Journal of College and University Law 261 (Winter 1994); also see John H. Robinson and Catherine Pieronek, "The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1994 in Review," 22 Journal of College and University Law 267 (Winter 1996).

Last Update: January 8, 2008


HEC HomeHigher Ed Center -|- About Us -|- Feedback -|- Shortcuts: